0x55aa
← Back to Blog

Good First Issues: The Open Source Gateway Drug 🚪💊

•9 min read
"open-source""github""community""contributing""beginners"

Good First Issues: The Open Source Gateway Drug 🚪💊

True story: The first time I tried to contribute to an open source project, I cloned the repo, opened 47 files, stared at the screen for 20 minutes, and then quietly closed my laptop and made tea.

I had no idea where to start. The codebase felt like a foreign city without a map. 🗺️

Then someone pointed me to the "good first issue" label. And everything changed.

As a full-time developer who contributes to open source, I now live on both sides of this label. I hunt for good first issues as a contributor, AND I create them as a maintainer. And let me tell you — this tiny GitHub label is secretly the most important thing in open source contribution! 🏷️

Why "Good First Issue" is the Most Powerful Label on GitHub 💪

Think of open source contribution like a gym.

You don't walk in on Day 1 and try to deadlift 200kg. You start with the beginner machines. You build muscle memory. Then, six months later, you're casually benching what used to look impossible.

"Good First Issue" is your beginner machine. 🏋️

But here's the dirty secret that nobody talks about: most "good first issue" labels are terrible.

They fall into two failure categories:

  1. Too easy: "Update README typo" — okay, great, but I learned nothing!
  2. Secretly terrifying: "Good first issue — just fix the authentication module!" — bro, that's NOT good for anyone!

Balancing work and open source taught me: The best first issues are ones where a newcomer can contribute meaningfully in 2-4 hours without needing to understand the entire codebase first! ⏰

How to FIND Good First Issues (The Hunter's Guide) 🔍

Method 1: The GitHub Filter Trick

https://github.com/issues?q=is:open+is:issue+label:"good+first+issue"+language:php

You can filter by:

  • Language (PHP, JavaScript, Python, Rust...)
  • Repository size
  • When it was last updated
  • Your timezone (no really, fresh issues = less competition!)

Pro tip: Add language:php or language:javascript to find issues in technologies you actually know! 🎯

Method 2: The "Good First Issue" Aggregators

These websites are like Tinder for open source contributions — but instead of swiping right on disasters, you find actual good matches:

  • goodfirstissue.dev — curated by language
  • up-for-grabs.net — issues waiting for someone exactly like you
  • firsttimersonly.com — issues reserved for first-time contributors (yes, reserved! Like a table at a restaurant!)

Method 3: The "Follow the Bug" Approach

My personal favorite method:

  1. Use a library in your day job
  2. Encounter a confusing behavior
  3. Check if there's an issue about it
  4. If yes — offer to fix it!
  5. If no — create the issue, then fix it!

This is literally how I made my first meaningful open source contribution. I was building a Laravel package, hit a weird edge case in a dependency, Googled for 30 minutes, found NO issue about it — and realized I was looking at a fresh bug. I filed the issue AND submitted the fix. Merged in 3 days! 🎉

In the security community, we call this "eating your own dog food" — using tools yourself means you find issues organically! 🐕

Method 4: The "Scan the Issues Before Using" Habit

Before you adopt any new library or tool, spend 5 minutes on its Issues tab:

□ How many open issues?
□ Are there "good first issue" tags?
□ What's the maintainer response time?
□ Any recent activity?

If you find a project with active maintainers and well-labeled issues, you've found gold! Bookmark it, use it, contribute to it.

The Good First Issue Spectrum (Know Before You Click) 🎯

Not all good first issues are equal. Here's how to evaluate them before you commit:

🟢 The Actual Good One

Title: "Add input validation for empty strings in parseDate()"

What needs doing:
- The parseDate() function doesn't handle empty strings gracefully
- It should return null or throw a ValidationError
- Tests are in tests/date.test.js
- No other files need changing
- Here's the expected behavior: [code example]

Difficulty: Low — one function, clear scope, tests already set up

Signs it's actually good:

  • Clear scope (one function, one file)
  • Expected behavior is defined
  • Points you to where the tests live
  • One right answer, not "figure it out"

🟡 The Sneaky Hard One

Title: "Improve error handling" [good first issue]

...that's it. That's the whole description.

Translation: The maintainer has 47 other things to do and slapped the label on this hoping someone else figures it out. Run. 🏃

🔴 The Accidental Nightmare

Title: "Refactor the authentication middleware" [good first issue]

We should probably clean up the auth flow. The current implementation
touches UserService, SessionManager, TokenValidator, RateLimiter, and
the main middleware chain...

Translation: This is a senior-level architectural change mislabeled. You'll spend 3 weeks on this and the PR will need 5 rounds of review. Not your fault — maintainer miscalculated!

The Maintainer Perspective: Creating Good First Issues 🛠️

Okay, here's where I switch hats.

As a maintainer on a few smaller PHP/Laravel packages, I've learned that creating good first issues is a skill — and most maintainers do it wrong.

The 5 Rules of Writing Actual Good First Issues

Rule 1: Scope It to One File

❌ Bad: "Improve test coverage"
✅ Good: "Add tests for the validateEmail() function in src/Validators/Email.php"

Newcomers shouldn't need to understand the architecture to contribute!

Rule 2: Include the "Definition of Done"

❌ Bad: "Fix the date parsing"
✅ Good: "parseDate('') should return null. Currently throws TypeError.
         Test in tests/DateTest.php. PR should make line 23 of that test pass."

One green test = done. No ambiguity. No back-and-forth!

Rule 3: Point to the Right Files

# Good First Issue Template

**What to change:** src/Validators/Email.php, line 45
**What to test:** tests/EmailTest.php, test_empty_email()
**Documentation update needed:** No
**Estimated time:** 30-60 minutes

Rule 4: Label the Difficulty Honestly

Use sub-labels if you can:

  • good first issue (2-4 hours, one file)
  • good first issue - documentation (just writing, no code!)
  • good first issue - tests (write tests only, no logic change)

Rule 5: Respond Quickly When Someone Claims It

Nothing kills open source momentum like a newcomer saying "I'd like to work on this!" and the maintainer responding 3 weeks later.

Balancing work and open source taught me: If you create a good first issue, set a reminder to check it daily for the first week! Fast feedback = contributors who come back for second contributions! 🔄

My Best Good First Issue Story 📖

A few years back, I was using an open source PHP security library for token validation. I noticed the error messages were... not great. They'd say things like "Validation failed" with zero context. As someone working in security, vague errors drive me insane.

I opened an issue: "Improve error messages to include what validation failed and why."

The maintainer responded: "Yes! Want to take a crack at it?"

I spent a Saturday afternoon on it. I added descriptive messages, updated 3 failing tests, added 2 new tests, and documented the error codes. The PR took 45 minutes to get reviewed and merged.

What I got out of it:

  • My name in the CHANGELOG 🎉
  • A shoutout in the release notes
  • Three follow-up issues the maintainer specifically tagged me in
  • A relationship with a maintainer who later helped me debug something horrible in production

Zero code came before that relationship. It was a documentation + error message PR. That's it.

In the security community, the saying goes: "The best way to trust a tool is to understand it. The best way to understand it is to contribute to it." 🔐

Where to Start If You're Brand New 🌱

This week: Find ONE project you already use. Check its Issues tab. Look for good first issue labels.

This month: Make ONE contribution. It could be:

  • Fixing a typo in docs
  • Adding a test that's missing
  • Improving an error message
  • Adding an example to the README
  • Translating documentation

Seriously, pick the easiest thing you can find. The hardest part is making your first PR. After that, the second PR is 10x easier because you know the workflow, the maintainer, and the codebase already!

Tools That Make Good First Issue Hunting Easier 🛠️

# GitHub CLI - search for good first issues from terminal
gh issue list --repo laravel/framework --label "good first issue"

# Or search across all GitHub
gh search issues --label "good first issue" --language PHP --state open

Websites:

  • goodfirstissue.dev - language-filtered, active repos only
  • codetriage.com - sends you one open source issue per day (genius!)
  • issuehub.pro - search by label across all public repos
  • up-for-grabs.net - categorized by project type

Chrome Extension: There's an extension called "GitHub Good First Issues" that highlights them in green while browsing. Because why not!

The TL;DR 🏁

If you're a contributor:

  • Use language filters to find issues in tech you know
  • Look for issues with clear scope, defined outcomes, and active maintainers
  • The "smallest possible contribution" is NOT a weakness — it's the start of something bigger
  • CodeTriage.com is secretly amazing

If you're a maintainer:

  • Good first issues are how you grow your contributor community
  • Scope to one file, define "done", respond fast
  • A first-time contributor who has a good experience = a long-term contributor
  • Consider reserving some for first-timers only (firsttimersonly.com convention)

The truth about open source contribution:

Nobody expects you to understand everything. Good first issues exist precisely because maintainers WANT newcomers to contribute — they just need to make the door easy to open.

You don't need to be good at open source to start contributing. You just need to start contributing to get good at open source. 🚀

Found a great good first issue lately? Connect on GitHub or LinkedIn — I'm always up for swapping contribution war stories!

Now close this tab and go find an issue to fix. 🐛➡️✅

P.S. If you're a maintainer and haven't labeled any issues as "good first issue" yet — go do it right now. Even one issue with clear instructions can change someone's open source journey forever. Your past self needed someone to create that issue. Pay it forward! 💚

← Back to all posts