0x55aa
← Back to Blog

Why Rust Doesn't Need a Garbage Collector (And Why That's Pure Genius) šŸ¦€šŸš®

•10 min read

Why Rust Doesn't Need a Garbage Collector (And Why That's Pure Genius) šŸ¦€šŸš®

Plot twist: The best garbage collector is the one you don't have! šŸŽ­

I know, I know. Every "modern" language you've touched has garbage collection. Java has it. Go has it. JavaScript has it. Python has it. Even your smart toaster probably has a GC at this point!

So when you hear "Rust has no garbage collector," your brain immediately goes: "Wait, how do you manage memory? Manual malloc/free like some kind of C caveman?"

Rust's answer: "Hold my memory-safe beer." šŸŗ

The Garbage Collection Tax You've Been Paying šŸ’ø

Before we talk about why Rust doesn't need a GC, let's talk about what GC actually COSTS you (and nobody mentions in tutorials):

Cost #1: The Random Pause of Death

Your experience:

// JavaScript doing its thing
const results = await processHugeDataset();
// Everything's fine... or is it?

What you don't see:

[Your app] Running smoothly... 16ms per frame... buttery smooth...
[GC] "Hey I'm gonna pause EVERYTHING and clean up memory!"
[Your app] *FREEZES FOR 100ms*
[Your users] "Why is this app so laggy?!"

Real talk: GC pauses are why your video game stutters. Why your web app feels janky. Why your trading platform missed that million-dollar opportunity. GC doesn't care about your problems! 😤

Cost #2: The Memory Bloat

In Java/Go/JavaScript:

// You allocate 100MB of objects
List<BigObject> stuff = new ArrayList<>();
for (int i = 0; i < 1000; i++) {
    stuff.add(new BigObject());  // 100KB each
}

// Actual memory used: 200-300MB!
// GC needs headroom to work efficiently

The hidden truth: GC languages typically use 2-3x the memory you actually need. The GC needs "space to breathe" to track objects and decide what to collect!

Translation: That 500MB Node.js server? In Rust it would be 150MB. Your AWS bill just got 3x smaller! šŸ’°

Cost #3: The Unpredictable Performance

Your benchmarks:

  • Run 1: 50ms āœ…
  • Run 2: 55ms āœ…
  • Run 3: 52ms āœ…
  • Run 4: 350ms āŒ (GC kicked in)
  • Run 5: 51ms āœ…

The problem: You can't predict WHEN the GC will run. It's like having a coworker who randomly decides to reorganize the entire office while you're trying to work!

For real-time systems: (Games, audio processing, trading systems) - GC pauses are a HARD NO! You need consistent, predictable performance. No surprises!

How Rust Pulls Off This Magic Trick šŸŖ„

The secret: Rust figured out when objects should be freed... AT COMPILE TIME! No runtime GC needed!

Here's the genius part:

Ownership Rules (The Three Laws of Robotics, But for Memory)

Rule 1: Each value has exactly ONE owner

let s = String::from("hello");  // s owns the string
// s is responsible for cleaning up when it goes out of scope

Rule 2: When the owner goes out of scope, value is dropped

{
    let s = String::from("hello");  // s owns this
    // use s here...
}  // <- s goes out of scope, memory AUTOMATICALLY freed!
   // No GC needed! Compiler inserted the cleanup code!

Rule 3: Ownership can be transferred (moved)

let s1 = String::from("hello");
let s2 = s1;  // Ownership moved to s2

// s1 is now INVALID (compiler won't let you use it!)
// Only s2 can free this memory - no double-free bugs!

The mind-blowing part: The compiler tracks all of this and inserts cleanup code EXACTLY where needed. No runtime overhead. No GC. No pauses. Just perfect memory management! šŸŽÆ

The Performance Comparison (Receipts!) šŸ“Š

Let me show you what this means in practice:

Scenario: Processing 1 million records

Java (with GC):

// Typical run
List<Record> records = loadRecords();  // 100MB allocated

for (Record r : records) {
    process(r);  // Allocates temporary objects
}

// Runtime: 1000ms
// Memory used: 250MB (GC needs overhead)
// GC pauses: 3-5 times, 20-50ms each
// Predictability: Low (pause timing varies)

Rust (no GC):

// Same task
let records = load_records();  // 100MB allocated

for record in records {
    process(record);  // Temporary objects freed immediately!
}

// Runtime: 400ms (2.5x faster!)
// Memory used: 105MB (just the data, minimal overhead)
// GC pauses: ZERO. NONE. NADA.
// Predictability: Perfect (every run is identical)

The difference:

  • 2.5x faster (no GC overhead eating CPU)
  • 2.4x less memory (no GC headroom needed)
  • Zero pauses (no stop-the-world collections)
  • Predictable (same performance every time)

Your AWS bill: Just got slashed in half! šŸ’°

The Real-World Impact šŸŒ

Example 1: Discord's Migration to Rust

The story: Discord's Read States service (tracks read/unread messages) was in Go. Performance was okay... except for the GC pauses!

The problem:

  • Go GC would pause for 10-100ms every few seconds
  • Under load, latency spikes were BRUTAL
  • Memory usage was unpredictable

After migrating to Rust:

  • Latency went from "spiky mess" to "consistently low"
  • Memory usage dropped by 50%
  • Zero GC pauses ruining user experience
  • Same server handled 10x the traffic!

Source: Discord's blog post on switching to Rust

Example 2: Amazon Firecracker (AWS Lambda's Secret Weapon)

What it is: The tech behind AWS Lambda - spins up micro-VMs in milliseconds!

Why Rust:

  • Lambda needs to start FAST (cold starts are the enemy)
  • GC pauses would ruin the whole point
  • Memory footprint needs to be TINY (you're running thousands of these!)

The result:

  • Firecracker boots a VM in <125ms
  • Uses <5MB of RAM per VM
  • Handles thousands of VMs per host
  • Could this work with a GC language? NOPE! 🚫

Example 3: Game Engines (No GC = No Frame Stutters)

The requirement: 60fps = 16.67ms per frame. EVERY FRAME.

With GC:

Frame 1: 14ms āœ…
Frame 2: 15ms āœ…
Frame 3: 13ms āœ…
Frame 4: 80ms āŒ (GC pause = stutter!)
Frame 5: 14ms āœ…

With Rust:

Frame 1: 14ms āœ…
Frame 2: 15ms āœ…
Frame 3: 13ms āœ…
Frame 4: 14ms āœ… (no GC, no pause!)
Frame 5: 14ms āœ…

Translation: Your game is SMOOTH. No random stutters. Players don't rage quit! šŸŽ®

"But Manual Memory Management is HARD!" šŸ¤”

You're thinking: "Okay, no GC sounds great, but doesn't that mean I have to manually free everything like in C?"

Rust: "Nah fam, the compiler does it FOR you!"

In C (manual, error-prone):

char* s = malloc(100);
// ... 200 lines of code later ...
free(s);  // Hope you didn't forget! šŸ¤ž
// Hope you don't use s after this! šŸ¤ž
// Hope you don't double-free! šŸ¤ž

One mistake = Memory leak, use-after-free, or crash! Choose your disaster! šŸ’€

In Rust (automatic, compiler-verified):

{
    let s = String::from("hello");
    // ... use s ...
}  // Automatically freed! Compiler GUARANTEES it!
   // Try to use s after this? COMPILE ERROR!
   // Try to double-free? IMPOSSIBLE!

The magic: You get automatic memory management like GC languages, but with ZERO runtime cost! Best of both worlds! 🌟

The Trade-offs (Gotta Be Honest) āš–ļø

Rust's no-GC approach isn't free. Here's what you give up:

Trade-off #1: Learning Curve

Truth bomb: Understanding ownership takes TIME!

Week 1: "WHY WON'T THIS COMPILE?!" 😤

Week 2: "Okay, I think I get it..." šŸ¤”

Week 3: "Wait, this actually makes SENSE!" šŸ’”

Week 4: "How did I ever live WITHOUT this?!" 🤯

The deal: Invest a few weeks learning ownership, save YEARS of debugging memory bugs!

Trade-off #2: Compile Times

The cost of compile-time perfection: Rust compiles SLOW!

  • Go: "Here's your binary!" (3 seconds)
  • Rust: "Let me check EVERYTHING..." (30 seconds)

Why it's slow: The compiler is doing ALL the work:

  • Ownership checking
  • Lifetime inference
  • Monomorphization (generating optimized code for each type)
  • Aggressive optimizations

The payoff: Longer compiles, but your code is CORRECT and FAST when it does compile!

Pro tip: Use cargo check during development (fast!), save full builds for final testing!

Trade-off #3: Fighting the Compiler

Real talk: The compiler will reject code that WOULD work in other languages!

// This is SAFE in Go/Java, but Rust says NO!
let mut data = vec![1, 2, 3];
let first = &data[0];  // Borrow the first element
data.push(4);  // ERROR! Can't modify while borrowed!
println!("{}", first);

Why Rust rejects it: push might reallocate the vector, making first point to freed memory! The compiler PROTECTS you from this bug!

The pattern: Rust forces you to think about ownership. Annoying at first, life-saving in production!

When To Use Rust (And When Not To) šŸŽÆ

Use Rust when:

āœ… Performance matters (web servers, game engines, databases)

āœ… Predictable latency is critical (trading systems, real-time apps)

āœ… Memory efficiency matters (embedded systems, cloud costs)

āœ… Safety is non-negotiable (aerospace, medical devices, crypto)

āœ… You're tired of debugging memory leaks (been there!)

Maybe skip Rust when:

āš ļø Quick prototypes (Python/JavaScript are faster to write)

āš ļø Team is unfamiliar and deadline is tight (learning curve is real)

āš ļø Simple CRUD app (unless you WANT to learn Rust!)

āš ļø GC pauses aren't a problem (many apps are totally fine with GC)

Real talk: Not everything needs Rust! But if you need NO GC pauses and maximum performance? Rust is your language! šŸ¦€

The Bottom Line šŸŽÆ

Garbage collection seemed like the perfect solution:

  • No manual memory management! āœ…
  • No memory leaks! āœ…
  • Easy to learn! āœ…

But the COST was:

  • Random pauses ruining your latency šŸ’€
  • 2-3x memory overhead šŸ’ø
  • Unpredictable performance šŸŽ²
  • Can't use it for real-time systems 🚫

Rust asked: "What if we could get automatic memory management WITHOUT garbage collection?"

The answer: Ownership! Track lifetimes at COMPILE TIME instead of runtime!

The result:

  • No GC pauses (ever!) āœ…
  • Minimal memory overhead āœ…
  • Predictable, consistent performance āœ…
  • Works for real-time systems āœ…
  • Memory safe by default āœ…

Think about it: Would you rather have a garbage collector that MIGHT pause at a bad time, or a compiler that GUARANTEES your memory management is correct?

I know my answer! šŸ¦€

Remember:

  1. GC pauses = unpredictable performance (bad for real-time!)
  2. GC overhead = 2-3x memory usage (expensive!)
  3. Rust's ownership = automatic cleanup WITHOUT GC (genius!)
  4. Compile-time checks = zero runtime cost (free performance!)
  5. Learning curve is real, but payoff is MASSIVE (invest once, benefit forever!)

The best garbage collector is the one you don't need. Rust proved it! šŸš€āœØ


Ready to ditch the GC? Connect with me on LinkedIn - let's talk memory management!

Want to see GC-free code in action? Check out my GitHub and follow this blog!

Now go write some code that NEVER pauses unexpectedly! šŸ¦€šŸ”„